This directory is public infrastructure.

No institution pays to be listed, to be described, or to change what is said about it. A school, a board, an association or a seminar company appears here because it publishes something a student needs to read, and it appears on the same terms whether it has ever spoken to us or not.

Every directory that ever sold its ordering said it would not. It happened gradually, under pressure, one defensible exception at a time. The only defense against that is to write the rule down in public while there is still nothing to gain by breaking it — so this page exists before the money does.

The distinction this page exists to hold

Sponsorship pays for infrastructure that everyone can see and everyone benefits from equally. Paid placement changes what a student sees. The first is how good things get funded. The second is how directories stop being worth reading.

They are easy to tell apart in the abstract and hard to tell apart at the moment someone offers you money. So the difference is defined here as three questions with yes-or-no answers, applied to every arrangement before it is agreed.

Test one · withdrawal If every funder withdrew tomorrow, would anything a student sees change?

Not whether the site would still be affordable to run — whether a single listing would move, appear, or disappear.

If anything would change, it was placement, and it is refused.

Test two · the peer Does anyone appear less because someone else paid?

Position is a fixed quantity. Any arrangement that lifts one entry or one offer lowers the ones around it, whether or not it was sold that way, and the people lowered never agreed to it.

If a non-paying peer is worse off, it was placement, and it is refused.

Test three · the student Could a student work out who paid, by looking at what they were shown?

The answer here should be no — not because the funding is hidden, but because it never touched the ordering. Every funder is named on this page. None of them is detectable anywhere else on the site.

If money is visible in the ordering, it was placement, and it is refused.

What money can and cannot do here

What funding pays for

  • Running and maintaining the directory itself
  • The archive work — transcription, indexing, permissions
  • Keeping the whole directory free to read, free to be listed in, and free to list an offer in
  • Research that gets published whatever it finds

What no amount of money buys

  • Position, ordering, or a featured slot
  • Inclusion — inclusion is free, so there is nothing to sell
  • Exclusivity, or the removal of anyone else
  • A student's contact details, in any form or wrapping
  • A claim on the page that we cannot source

What funds it, and what cannot

Three kinds of money can fund this directory. None of them touches what a student sees.

Grants
Money given for the directory as a whole, or for a piece of research that is published whatever it finds.
Sponsorships
Money that pays for infrastructure everyone sees and everyone benefits from equally. A sponsor is named below and nowhere else on the site, and passes the three tests above or is refused.
Licensing of the data
The data is licensed on one set of terms, and those terms are the same for anyone who asks. A licensee gets the data; it does not get a different entry, an earlier look, or a say in what the data records.
What cannot fund it
Any institution described on this site, for anything that touches its own entry. Its listing, its description, its corrections and its place on any page are not for sale to it in any form, and an offer of that kind is refused rather than redesigned until it passes.

The Kaleidoscope is published by ChiroTrack, and ChiroTrack sets out how its own work is paid for at thechirotrack.com/how-this-is-funded.html; this page holds the rules for the directory.

Every funder, named

Every grant-maker, every sponsor and every data licensee is listed here, by name, from the day the arrangement begins. An arrangement that cannot be listed here is not made.

Grants

None, as of 4 October 2026.

Sponsors

None, as of 4 October 2026.

Data licensees

None, as of 4 October 2026.

Models we have turned down, and why

Naming these matters more than naming what we do, because these are the specific offers that arrive and each one has a reasonable-sounding argument attached.

Display advertising
Ad targeting on a student research session is a lead sale with extra steps. The revenue would be trivial and the cost would be the thing this site is for.
Paid or enhanced listings
Fails test two. A richer entry for payers is a poorer entry for everyone else, and the people made poorer never consented. The same applies to offers: every offer in the register carries the same fields.
Selling student inquiries
Refused in every form, including the polite ones — warm introductions, qualified referrals, shared interest lists. A student asking a question is not inventory.
Application or enrollment commission
Being paid per application makes it impossible to write honestly about whether someone should apply. That is the one question a student most needs answered straight.
Sponsored recommendations
Fails all three tests at once. It is the thing this page exists to make impossible.

Hold us to it

If you ever see something on this site that looks like it was paid for, say so and we will either show you it wasn't or take it down. That request is answered by a person, not a policy team.

Every grant-maker, sponsor and data licensee is named above.